top of page
  • Writer's pictureSam Orlando

When Soap Operas Go Legal: The Richmond Inmate Who’s Fighting for His Right to...Hygiene

Written by: Sam Orlando

Of Laws and Lathers

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA - In the great annals of American jurisprudence, certain cases rise to legendary status. Brown v. Board of Education. Roe v. Wade. And now, in a lawsuit filed in the Eastern District of Virginia, we may have another contender: Ford v. Irving. DEQuan Pleasants Ford, an inmate at Richmond City Justice Center, has filed a case against Antionette V. Irvin, the Sheriff of the very institution holding him. His grievance? A purported violation of his 8th Amendment rights, claiming "deprivation of adequate hygiene supplies." Yes, you read that correctly.

The Eighth Amendment, Soaps, and Shampoos

Ford isn't just throwing around legal jargon here. He's leaning on the Eighth Amendment, which, for those who snoozed through Civics class, prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. According to the plaintiff, the jail's "showing" system contains water with "flesh-eating qualities such as bleach and other normal chemicals." And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Basic toiletries, like soap and shampoo, are also in disturbingly short supply, according to Ford's claim. This, despite the Richmond City Policy Handbook's promise on page 11 that inmates are supposed to receive such items. Ah, the lofty rhetoric of handbooks!

"Flesh-Eating" Showers and the Human Right to Soap

Even if we ignore Ford's slightly melodramatic description of "flesh-eating" water, there's the issue of basic hygiene products. The jail administration's excuse? "The jail doesn't supply hygiene bags even to indigent inmates." So, unless Ford has a secret stash of luxury soap and a platinum toothbrush, it seems he's out of luck.

To Grievance or Not to Grievance, That Is the Question

Ford, for his part, has tried the internal grievance process. Not just once, but multiple times. And Sheriff Irving's response? A masterclass in bureaucratic tautology: "There is nothing wrong with the water," and they don't provide hygiene bags. It's like claiming the sun is cold and the ocean isn't wet.

Demanding Sudsy Justice

Ford is demanding a sum of $75,000 for the egregious affront to his hygiene. And let's not forget the cornerstone of his lawsuit: an injunction requiring the jail to "supply weekly hygiene products." He might not be fighting for integration or reproductive rights, but Ford is fighting for something equally fundamental: cleanliness.

A Quixotic Quest or a Dirty Injustice?

Is Ford's lawsuit an act of courtroom quixotism, or does it underline a very basic human need that we've all taken for granted? Either way, his case brings up questions about how we treat those in the prison system. What's certain is that Ford's quest for cleaner living conditions won't just wash away, regardless of the chemicals in the shower.

5 views0 comments


bottom of page