top of page

Trump Seeks Hundreds of Millions in Damages Against the DOJ — A Case for Why They Should Pay

  • Writer: Sam Orlando
    Sam Orlando
  • Oct 24
  • 3 min read

The real story isn’t Trump’s audacity — it’s the power of the DOJ to ruin lives with no accountability.


ree

Written by: Sam Orlando


STAUNTON, VIRGINIA - In 1996, a Georgia security guard named Richard Jewell found a backpack stuffed with explosives at the Atlanta Olympics and helped evacuate the area. He was a hero—until the FBI leaked his name to reporters as a “person of interest.”


Within hours, his life became a circus. Cameras camped on his lawn, agents searched his mother’s apartment, pundits mocked his weight and ambition. Jewell was never charged, completely exonerated, and later praised for saving lives. But the damage never left him. He died a decade later at forty-four, still shadowed by a crime he didn’t commit.


The Department of Justice never apologized. Never compensated him. Never faced consequences for burning a man alive in the court of public opinion.


That’s what unchecked federal power looks like. And it’s the unspoken context behind this week’s headlines about Donald Trump demanding $230 million from the DOJ for investigating him.


The punchline everyone missed

Many people greeted Trump’s claim the way they greet every Trump story—with eye-rolling disbelief. Another tantrum. Another grift. Maybe it is. But maybe it’s also something else: the inevitable backlash against a system that can destroy reputations with impunity.


When the Department of Justice decides to investigate, there are no real consequences for getting it wrong. The process becomes the punishment. Lives can be dismantled on suspicion alone, and there’s no legal path to recover what’s lost.


Just ask Richard Jewell.


The god complex in a government badge

The DOJ isn’t supposed to be executioner and judge. Yet it wields both roles, controlling the investigations, the prosecutions, and the press leaks that frame public opinion.


A single headline—“Federal investigators are looking into…”—can bankrupt a company, end a career, or wreck a family. Even if the target wins, the victory comes years too late to matter.


The government enjoys near-total qualified and prosecutorial immunity.  Unless an agent fabricates evidence outright, there’s no civil liability. And so the same system that crushed Jewell can do it again tomorrow—with no penalty, no precedent, no shame.


When Trump demands $230 million, he’s not just throwing a tantrum. He’s exposing a truth the rest of us already knew: the DOJ doesn’t pay for its mistakes.


The hypocrisy no one wants to talk about

When the feds target ordinary people, they hide behind immunity. When they target a president, suddenly the political class rediscovers the word accountability.


Critics warn that Trump is undermining democracy. But what if the deeper danger is a Justice Department so insulated that it can flatten citizens and never answer for it? What if Trump’s ridiculous demand simply magnifies a problem we’ve ignored since Richard Jewell’s front porch filled with cameras?


If the president ever succeeded—even partially—it would terrify bureaucrats, not because of the money but because of the precedent. If the DOJ can be forced to pay when it ruins someone’s life, who’s next?


The sacred cow of “good faith”

Federal power hides behind the myth of good faith. Prosecutors and agents can upend lives, and we’re told they were just doing their jobs. When a case collapses, we hear “mistakes were made.”


In every other profession, mistakes have consequences. Doctors get sued. Engineers lose licenses. Journalists get fired. Only prosecutors get promoted.


The DOJ insists that accountability would cripple its work—that fear of liability would chill enforcement. But justice without accountability isn’t justice; it’s an untouchable class of officials claiming virtue as a shield.


The heresy of saying it out loud

Defending the idea that Trump might have a point feels radioactive. It sounds like endorsement. But if the truth depends on who speaks it, then truth itself is partisan.


Trump’s motives are self-serving; the DOJ’s motives are self-protective. Between them sits the rest of the country, trapped between a demagogue and an institution that believes it can do no wrong.


This isn’t about Trump being right. It’s about the rest of us being powerless.


Maybe the check is worth it

Richard Jewell never got his life back. He proved his innocence, and the government walked away untouched.


If it takes one president’s audacity to force the Department of Justice to look in the mirror—to remind the all-powerful prosecution arm of the federal government that power without consequence breeds corruption—maybe that’s worth something.


Maybe it’s even worth $230 million dollars.

 
 
 

© 2015 by Breaking Through. 

bottom of page