top of page
  • Writer's pictureSam Orlando

Sheriff's Neglect and Victim's Hardship: A Deeper Look into the Tragedy of Bear the Service Dog

Sheriff's Inaction and a Victim's Burden: The Tragic Case of Bear the Service Dog

AUGUSTA COUNTY, VIRGINIA - In a heartbreaking story originally reported by the Augusta Free Press, the tragic case of Bear, a service dog shot and killed in Augusta County, Virginia, highlights not only the cruelty of the act but also the systemic failures and the burdens placed on the victims, Joeseph and Edith Sande.

On September 15. the Sande's were confronted with the horror that their neighbor had killed Joeseph's service animal. As we delve deeper into this case, the question arises: Could this tragedy have been prevented if the local sheriff's department had acted on any of the Sande's several prior complaints?

Sheriff's Inaction: Ignoring the Warning Signs

Before the fatal incident on September 15, the Sandes had lived in fear. Their neighbor, Louis Edward Davis, who faces charges for animal cruelty and reckless handling of a firearm, was known to them as a threat. Despite multiple outreach efforts to the Augusta County Sheriff’s Office regarding violations of court orders and concerns over Davis's behavior, the Sandes’ pleas for help were met with no enforcement action. This lack of response begs the question: Why were the Sandes' legitimate concerns not addressed more seriously?

The Burden of Security: Victims Pay the Price

The tragedy led to the Sandes enhancing the security around their home, a cost that they should not have had to bear. They have installed outdoor cameras to monitor their surviving dogs, a step taken out of necessity rather than choice. This reality speaks volumes about the state of affairs where victims are forced to fend for themselves, investing in security measures because the systems meant to protect them failed.

A Deeper Impact: Beyond Physical Security

The loss of Bear was not just an emotional blow but also a significant disruption to Joeseph Sande's coping mechanisms for PTSD, a condition he battles due to his military service. Bear was not just a pet; he was a lifeline. The responsibility has now fallen on Edith Sande, impacting her job and their normal way of life. This shift in dynamics illustrates the profound impact an act of cruelty can have, extending well beyond the immediate physical loss.

Conclusion: Seeking Justice and Systemic Change

As the Sandes prepare for the upcoming court date, their story is a stark reminder of the gaps in our justice and law enforcement systems. It highlights the need for more proactive measures in responding to potential threats and better support for victims of such senseless acts. The community's support, as shown through a GoFundMe campaign, is a silver lining, yet it underscores a troubling reality where victims are left to shoulder the burden in the aftermath of a tragedy.

As we continue to follow this case, the hope is not just for justice for Bear but also for systemic changes that ensure no other family has to endure such a devastating experience due to inaction and neglect by those sworn to protect them.

58 views0 comments


bottom of page