top of page
  • Writer's pictureSam Orlando

Expert: Big Win for Prosecutors in Bigsby Case May Come at a Huge Cost, A Possible Loss at Trial

Written by: Michael Phillips

The Conflicting Confessions

HAMPTON, VIRGINIA – The Cory Bigsby trial, already steeped in controversy, faces further complications with the judge's decision to admit multiple, conflicting confessions into evidence. This ruling, initially seen as a victory for the prosecution, now raises profound questions about the reliability of these statements and their potential to undermine the case.

Discrepancies in Bigsby’s Statements

Cory Bigsby's statements, made under varying circumstances, tell different stories about the events leading to his son Codi's disappearance. Notably, on August 3, 2022, Bigsby reportedly claimed he found his son "unresponsive at the bottom of the steps," suggesting a tragic accident. Yet, in a turn towards the desperate, Bigsby also described burying his son behind a building in Hyattsville, Maryland, after failed CPR attempts—a site where law enforcement found no evidence.

Legal Expert Weighs In

Cedric Severino, a seasoned criminal defense attorney and former public defender, sheds light on the complex dynamics at play. "When a confession is obtained through duress or coercion, it's not just a legal problem; it's a fundamental violation of the defendant's rights," Severino explains. "These confessions, especially in a high-pressure environment, often stem from a panicked state where the defendant seeks to end the interrogation rather than make a voluntary statement."

Allegations of Coerced Confessions

Adding to the trial's complexity are allegations from Bigsby's legal team that the confessions were coerced, with promises of family visits being used as leverage. Such claims contrast starkly with the testimony from jail authorities who cite concerns for Bigsby's mental health as the reason for these family interactions.

Ethical and Legal Implications

Severino points out the ethical and legal hazards of such practices. "If prosecutors use a confession known to be coerced, it's a breach of ethical responsibility. Defense attorneys, in turn, are duty-bound to challenge these confessions and demonstrate their unreliability," he states.

The Defense’s Strategy

The defense's strategy is clear: to highlight the varying nature of Bigsby's confessions and the circumstances under which they were made. Severino warns of the risks: "The biggest danger here is the potential for wrongful conviction. Juries tend to rely heavily on confessions, and if they're false, it undermines the entire judicial process."

Jury Perception and Investigative Practices

The prosecution's decision to use these confessions could inadvertently expose the jury to the nuances of the interrogation process, potentially revealing alleged mistreatment. "Juries could question the validity of confessions if they're aware of the duress involved," Severino adds. "Inconsistent confessions present a unique challenge, as they can be interpreted either as partial truths or as attempts to comply with interrogators’ demands."

As for investigative practices, Severino emphasizes the need for transparency. "All confessions should be videotaped without cuts to ensure no undue pressure is exerted. Investigators must be vigilant to prevent coercion."

Implications for the Justice System

The Bigsby trial continues to be a litmus test for the justice system, probing the balance between effective law enforcement and the protection of individual rights. With the introduction of these confessions, the prosecution may find itself navigating a legal and moral minefield, with the potential to affect public trust and set a precedent for future cases.

Consider this: John McCain, a man who ran for President in 2016 and was considered a war hero, confessed to a series of crimes when he was tortured by his captors in Vietnam. He later recanted those confessions. And, of course, who can forget the case of the Central Park Five, who were convicted based on false confessions obtained by threat or force.

As Severino concludes, "This case could have far-reaching implications, not just for Bigsby but for how our system views and handles confessions obtained under questionable circumstances."


bottom of page