Written by: Sam Orlando
In a move billed as a triumph for transparency and accountability, the Biden administration is touting the success of the National Law Enforcement Accountability Database (NLEAD), a system designed to track law enforcement officers accused of misconduct. Established via executive order in May 2022, NLEAD is supposed to be a game-changing tool in the fight for police reform. There's just one catch: the public can’t access it.
Yes, you heard that right. The very database meant to enhance accountability is, in fact, off-limits to the people it’s supposedly designed to protect. According to government guidelines, NLEAD is exclusively available to “authorized users from federal law enforcement agencies.” The stated reason? Protecting the safety, privacy, and due process rights of the officers listed within it.
In other words, the federal government has essentially built a digital vault of misconduct records, locked the door, and handed the keys to law enforcement agencies—the same entities often accused of shielding officers from accountability in the first place.
Transparency, But Make It Secret
The idea of a national misconduct database isn’t inherently flawed. In theory, it’s a tool to prevent officers with histories of abuse from hopping between jurisdictions undetected. Think of it as a registry to stop the “bad apples” from spreading their rot. But what good is a tool for transparency when it operates in total secrecy?
The administration’s justification for the restricted access is, at best, a head-scratcher. Protecting due process rights is important, of course, but isn’t the public also entitled to know whether their local police department is hiring officers with histories of abuse? Critics argue that shielding this data from public scrutiny undermines the very purpose of accountability and reinforces the perception that the system prioritizes protecting its own over serving the public.
Coming Soon... Maybe
According to officials, the ultimate goal is to expand access to NLEAD to state and local agencies to “support hiring and workforce practices.” But even then, it will still likely remain hidden from public view. Imagine a world where an officer with a track record of excessive force could move to a new department, and the only people who might know are the ones in charge of hiring them. It’s accountability-lite, designed for internal consumption, not public trust.
The Bigger Problem
This secretive approach speaks to a larger issue in the ongoing debate over police reform: the reluctance to embrace real transparency. Reform efforts often make headlines, but too many of them stop short of giving the public the tools needed to hold law enforcement accountable. When the solution to decades of systemic misconduct is a database you’ll never see, it’s hard not to wonder if we’re missing the point entirely.
If the Biden administration is serious about reforming policing, they need to move beyond feel-good initiatives that sound impressive on paper but do little to restore public trust. A truly effective misconduct database would be accessible to the communities most impacted by police abuse, not locked away in the hands of the very institutions under scrutiny.
For now, the National Law Enforcement Accountability Database remains a black box of secrets, a symbol of transparency in name only. And while the administration pats itself on the back, the public is left to wonder: Who is this database really for?
Comments